DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2015 Porsche Cayman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Porsche Cayman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

86.75–87.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakePorsche
Range RoverModelCayman
2013Model year2015
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats2
5Doors2

Performance

7,9 s0–100 km/h5,7 s
209 km/hTop speed266 km/h
2993 ccEngine displacement2706 cc
258 HPPower275 HP
600 NmTorque290 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank64 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
7,0 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
8Gears6
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4999 mmLength4380 mm
1983 mmWidth1801 mm
1835 mmHeight1294 mm
2160 KgWeight1330 Kg
2922 mmWheelbase2475 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Land Rover Range Rover and 2015 Porsche Cayman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Porsche Cayman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…