2015 • Porsche
Cayman
Porsche Cayman 2.7 (275 Hp) 2015Overall Score87.25/100
2015 Porsche Cayman vs 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2013 • Land Rover
Range Rover
Land Rover Range Rover Range 3.0 V6 (258 Hp) 2013Overall Score86.75/100
WINNER
Porsche Cayman
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.
87.25–86.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Porsche CaymanSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
PorscheMakeLand Rover
CaymanModelRange Rover
2015Model year2013
CoupeBody typeSUV
2Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Porsche CaymanSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
5,7 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
266 km/hTop speed209 km/h
2706 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
275 HPPower258 HP
290 NmTorque600 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Porsche CaymanSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank85 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,0 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Porsche CaymanSpecificationLand Rover Range Rover
4380 mmLength4999 mm
1801 mmWidth1983 mm
1294 mmHeight1835 mm
1330 KgWeight2160 Kg
2475 mmWheelbase2922 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2015 Porsche Cayman and 2013 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Porsche Cayman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…