DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2003 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
Range RoverModelMondeo
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
179 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2926 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
177 HPPower204 HP
390 NmTorque280 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank56 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption15,1 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
255/55 R19Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4731 mm
1955 mmWidth1812 mm
1860 mmHeight1429 mm
2500 KgWeight1405 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2754 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Land Rover Range Rover and 2003 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…