DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2003 Citroen C5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeCitroen
Range RoverModelC5
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
179 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2926 ccEngine displacement2946 cc
177 HPPower207 HP
390 NmTorque285 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank66 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
255/55 R19Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4618 mm
1955 mmWidth1770 mm
1860 mmHeight1476 mm
2500 KgWeight1480 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Land Rover Range Rover and 2003 Citroen C5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…