DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2003 Chrysler Sebring Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Sebring

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeChrysler
Range RoverModelSebring
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,6 s0–100 km/h9,3 s
179 km/hTop speed216 km/h
2926 ccEngine displacement2736 cc
177 HPPower203 HP
390 NmTorque262 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank61 lt
14,4 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,4 lt
11,3 ltAverage consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
255/55 R19Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4950 mmLength4845 mm
1955 mmWidth1790 mm
1860 mmHeight1395 mm
2500 KgWeight1485 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2745 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Land Rover Range Rover and 2003 Chrysler Sebring approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Sebring leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…