DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Range Rover vs 2000 Chrysler Cirrus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chrysler Cirrus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

62.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeChrysler
Range RoverModelCirrus
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

14,3 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
185 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
136 HPPower164 HP
270 NmTorque221 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank60 lt
12,8 ltUrban consumption13 lt
8,9 ltExtra-urban consumption11 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
235/70 R16Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4713 mmLength4746 mm
1853 mmWidth1822 mm
1817 mmHeight1374 mm
2115 KgWeight1364 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase2743 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Range Rover and 2000 Chrysler Cirrus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chrysler Cirrus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…