DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs 2012 Mazda CX-7 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-7

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
Range Rover EvoqueModelCX-7
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
180 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
150 HPPower173 HP
380 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank69 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption9,1 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size235/60 R18; 235/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4355 mmLength4700 mm
1965 mmWidth1870 mm
1635 mmHeight1645 mm
1625 KgWeight1800 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2750 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2012 Mazda CX-7 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-7 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…