DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs 2011 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeMazda
Range Rover EvoqueModel3
2012Model year2011
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
180 km/hTop speed208 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
150 HPPower150 HP
380 NmTorque360 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4355 mmLength4580 mm
1965 mmWidth1755 mm
1635 mmHeight1470 mm
1625 KgWeight1390 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2011 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…