DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs 2011 Citroen C-Crosser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C-Crosser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeCitroen
Range Rover EvoqueModelC-Crosser
2012Model year2011
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
5Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
180 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
150 HPPower156 HP
380 NmTorque380 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,0 ltUrban consumption9,5 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
5,0 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/70 R16; 225/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4355 mmLength4646 mm
1965 mmWidth1806 mm
1635 mmHeight1715 mm
1625 KgWeight1790-1825 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque and 2011 Citroen C-Crosser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C-Crosser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…