DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Land Rover Freelander vs 2006 Honda Stepwgn Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Stepwgn

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeHonda
FreelanderModelStepwgn
2006Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
3Doors4

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2354 cc
177 HPPower162 HP
240 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption—
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
—Average consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4433 mmLength4670 mm
1809 mmWidth1695 mm
1709 mmHeight1845 mm
1550 KgWeight1570 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2805 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Land Rover Freelander and 2006 Honda Stepwgn approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Stepwgn leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…