DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Nissan Pathfinder vs 2006 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pathfinder

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeLand Rover
PathfinderModelFreelander
2006Model year2006
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

11,6 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
190 km/hTop speed182 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
174 HPPower177 HP
403 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,2 ltUrban consumption17,2 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption9,7 lt
10,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
255/65 R17Tyre size215/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4877 mmLength4433 mm
1854 mmWidth1809 mm
1879 mmHeight1709 mm
2165 KgWeight1550 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2557 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Nissan Pathfinder and 2006 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pathfinder leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…