DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Land Rover Freelander vs 2003 Seat Toledo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Toledo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

65.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeSeat
FreelanderModelToledo
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

11,1 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
182 km/hTop speed216 km/h
2497 ccEngine displacement2324 cc
177 HPPower170 HP
240 NmTorque220 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
17,2 ltUrban consumption12,4 lt
9,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
—Average consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4433 mmLength4439 mm
1809 mmWidth1742 mm
1709 mmHeight1436 mm
1550 KgWeight1386 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Land Rover Freelander and 2003 Seat Toledo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Toledo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…