DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Land Rover Freelander vs 2003 Toyota Opa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Opa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

62.25–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeToyota
FreelanderModelOpa
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

14,4 s0–100 km/h—
159 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1950 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
112 HPPower125 HP
260 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
195/80 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4250 mm
1809 mmWidth1695 mm
1708 mmHeight1530 mm
1565 KgWeight1210 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Land Rover Freelander and 2003 Toyota Opa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Opa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…