2003 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.9 TDI (101 Hp) 2003Overall Score62.5/100
2003 Volkswagen Polo vs 2003 Land Rover Freelander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Land Rover
Freelander
Land Rover Freelander 2.0 TD (112 Hp) 2003Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Volkswagen Polo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
62.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
VolkswagenMakeLand Rover
PoloModelFreelander
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3
Performance
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
—0–100 km/h14,4 s
0 km/hTop speed159 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1950 cc
101 HPPower112 HP
240 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
DieselFuel typeDiesel
45 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption9,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
195/55 R15Tyre size195/80 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
—Length4368 mm
—Width1809 mm
—Height1708 mm
—Weight1565 Kg
—Wheelbase2557 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Volkswagen Polo and 2003 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Volkswagen Polo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…