DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Land Rover Freelander vs 2003 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Freelander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

62.25–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeRenault
FreelanderModelMegane
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet, Coupe
5Seats2+2
3Doors2

Performance

14,4 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
159 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1950 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
112 HPPower120 HP
260 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
—Average consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/80 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4355 mm
1809 mmWidth1777 mm
1708 mmHeight1404 mm
1565 KgWeight1425 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2522 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Land Rover Freelander and 2003 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Freelander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…