DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Peugeot 206 vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Freelander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeLand Rover
206ModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h15,2 s
180 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
90 HPPower98 HP
205 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank59 lt
6,6 ltUrban consumption9,6 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,7 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size195/80 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3835 mmLength4380 mm
1652 mmWidth1805 mm
1432 mmHeight1760 mm
1070 KgWeight1405 Kg
2442 mmWheelbase2560 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Peugeot 206 and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Freelander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…