DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Toyota Corolla Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Corolla

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeToyota
FreelanderModelCorolla
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats4
5Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1794 cc
120 HPPower136 HP
165 NmTorque171 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank50 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4382 mmLength4385 mm
1805 mmWidth1695 mm
1760 mmHeight1475 mm
1380 KgWeight1090 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Toyota Corolla approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Corolla leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…