2000 • Lotus
Elise
Lotus Elise 1.8 i 16V (120 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.5/100
2000 Lotus Elise vs 2000 Land Rover Freelander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Land Rover
Freelander
Land Rover Freelander 1.8 i 16V (120 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Lotus Elise
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lotus EliseSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
LotusMakeLand Rover
EliseModelFreelander
2000Model year2000
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Lotus EliseSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
5,9 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
202 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
165 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Lotus EliseSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
PetrolFuel typePetrol
36 ltFuel tank59 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption13 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption8,6 lt
—Average consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Lotus EliseSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/55 R16; 205/50 R16Tyre size195/80 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Lotus EliseSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
3726 mmLength4382 mm
1701 mmWidth1805 mm
1202 mmHeight1760 mm
690 KgWeight1380 Kg
2300 mmWheelbase2560 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Lotus Elise and 2000 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Lotus Elise leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…