DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Nissan Pulsar Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Pulsar

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeNissan
FreelanderModelPulsar
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1769 cc
120 HPPower125 HP
165 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank0 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
195/80 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4382 mmLength—
1805 mmWidth—
1760 mmHeight—
1380 KgWeight—
2560 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Nissan Pulsar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Pulsar leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…