DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Nissan Avenir Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Avenir

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeNissan
FreelanderModelAvenir
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1769 cc
120 HPPower125 HP
165 NmTorque161 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank60 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4382 mmLength4650 mm
1805 mmWidth1695 mm
1760 mmHeight1490 mm
1380 KgWeight1300 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Nissan Avenir approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Avenir leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…