DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeNissan
FreelanderModelAD
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1769 cc
120 HPPower120 HP
165 NmTorque163 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank50 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4382 mmLength4370 mm
1805 mmWidth1695 mm
1760 mmHeight1475 mm
1380 KgWeight1130 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…