DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Land Rover Freelander vs 2000 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeKia
FreelanderModelOptima
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h—
165 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1836 cc
120 HPPower134 HP
165 NmTorque169 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank65 lt
13 ltUrban consumption—
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4382 mmLength4745 mm
1805 mmWidth1815 mm
1760 mmHeight1420 mm
1380 KgWeight1320 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Land Rover Freelander and 2000 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…