2003 • Lotus
Elise
Lotus Elise 1.8 i 16V (122 Hp) 2003Overall Score59.5/100
2003 Lotus Elise vs 2003 Land Rover Freelander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Land Rover
Freelander
Land Rover Freelander 1.8 i 16V (117 Hp) 2003Overall Score59.25/100
WINNER
Lotus Elise
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lotus EliseSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
LotusMakeLand Rover
EliseModelFreelander
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors5
Performance
Lotus EliseSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
5,7 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
200 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
122 HPPower117 HP
168 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Lotus EliseSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
PetrolFuel typePetrol
38 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
6,15 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Lotus EliseSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
175/55 R16; 225/45 R17Tyre size195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Lotus EliseSpecificationLand Rover Freelander
3785 mmLength4368 mm
1719 mmWidth1809 mm
1143 mmHeight1708 mm
756 KgWeight1510 Kg
2300 mmWheelbase2557 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Lotus Elise and 2003 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Lotus Elise leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…