DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Land Rover Freelander vs 2003 Opel Vectra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Vectra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeOpel
FreelanderModelVectra
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
160 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1910 cc
117 HPPower120 HP
160 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank61 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,7 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4596 mm
1809 mmWidth1798 mm
1708 mmHeight1460 mm
1510 KgWeight1523 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Land Rover Freelander and 2003 Opel Vectra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Vectra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…