DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Land Rover Freelander vs 2003 Ford Galaxy Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Galaxy

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
FreelanderModelGalaxy
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h12,8 s
160 km/hTop speed188 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
117 HPPower130 HP
160 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15Tyre size215/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength4641 mm
1809 mmWidth1810 mm
1708 mmHeight1730 mm
1510 KgWeight1670 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Land Rover Freelander and 2003 Ford Galaxy approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Galaxy leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…