DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Land Rover Discovery vs 2003 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

67.5–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeFord
DiscoveryModelExplorer
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,7 s0–100 km/h10,0 s
190 km/hTop speed180 km/h
3947 ccEngine displacement3996 cc
185 HPPower213 HP
340 NmTorque339 Nm
8Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
95 ltFuel tank85 lt
23,3 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
12,7 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt
16,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/70 R16Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4710 mmLength4810 mm
1860 mmWidth1830 mm
1890 mmHeight1830 mm
2020 KgWeight1965 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2890 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Land Rover Discovery and 2003 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…