DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 GMC Safari vs 2003 Land Rover Discovery Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Safari

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.75–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeLand Rover
SafariModelDiscovery
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats7
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,7 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
4300 ccEngine displacement3947 cc
190 HPPower185 HP
339 NmTorque340 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
102 ltFuel tank95 lt
—Urban consumption23,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12,7 lt
—Average consumption16,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size235/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4821 mmLength4710 mm
1968 mmWidth1860 mm
1900 mmHeight1890 mm
2083 KgWeight2020 Kg
2824 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 GMC Safari and 2003 Land Rover Discovery approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Safari leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…