2009 • Land Rover
Discovery
Land Rover Discovery 4.0 LR V6 (216 Hp) 2009Overall Score73.5/100
2009 Land Rover Discovery vs 2008 Chrysler Sebring Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2008 • Chrysler
Sebring
Chrysler Sebring 3.5i V6 (235 Hp) 2008Overall Score73.75/100
WINNER
Chrysler Sebring
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
73.5–73.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Land Rover DiscoverySpecificationChrysler Sebring
Land RoverMakeChrysler
DiscoveryModelSebring
2009Model year2008
SUVBody typeCabriolet
5/7Seats4
5Doors2
Performance
Land Rover DiscoverySpecificationChrysler Sebring
11,6 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3999 ccEngine displacement3518 cc
216 HPPower235 HP
360 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Land Rover DiscoverySpecificationChrysler Sebring
PetrolFuel typePetrol
86 ltFuel tank64 lt
15,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Land Rover DiscoverySpecificationChrysler Sebring
4829 mmLength4850 mm
—Width1843 mm
1887 mmHeight1497 mm
2885 mmWheelbase2765 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2009 Land Rover Discovery and 2008 Chrysler Sebring approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Chrysler Sebring leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSFord Sport Trac vs Land Rover Discovery2009 and 2009 model years
VSFord Ranger vs Land Rover Discovery2009 and 2009 model yearsImage unavailableVSToyota 4runner vs Land Rover Discovery2009 and 2009 model years
VSToyota Tacoma vs Land Rover Discovery2009 and 2009 model years
VSToyota Tundra vs Land Rover Discovery2009 and 2009 model yearsComments are loading…