DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Land Rover Discovery vs 2004 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

70.5–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeKia
DiscoveryModelOptima
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed209 km/h
2720 ccEngine displacement2494 cc
190 HPPower176 HP
440 NmTorque229 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
82 ltFuel tank65 lt
11,5 ltUrban consumption—
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
255/55 R19Tyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4835 mmLength4745 mm
2009 mmWidth1815 mm
1887 mmHeight1420 mm
2494 KgWeight1450 Kg
2885 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Land Rover Discovery and 2004 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…