DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Kia Optima vs 2004 Land Rover Discovery Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

71.5–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeLand Rover
OptimaModelDiscovery
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,5 s
209 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2720 cc
176 HPPower190 HP
229 NmTorque440 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank82 lt
—Urban consumption11,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,2 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears6
205/60 R15Tyre size255/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4745 mmLength4835 mm
1815 mmWidth2009 mm
1420 mmHeight1887 mm
1450 KgWeight2494 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2885 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Kia Optima and 2004 Land Rover Discovery approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…