DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Land Rover Defender vs 1996 Citroen XM Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Defender

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

59.5–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeCitroen
DefenderModelXM
1996Model year1996
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
6Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,1 s
115 km/hTop speed201 km/h
2495 ccEngine displacement2446 cc
83 HPPower129 HP
181 NmTorque285 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption10,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,9 lt
14,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/80 R16 STyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3722 mmLength4708 mm
1790 mmWidth1794 mm
2000 mmHeight1394 mm
1636 KgWeight1564 Kg
2360 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Land Rover Defender and 1996 Citroen XM approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Defender leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…