DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Alfa Romeo 164 vs 1996 Land Rover Defender Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Land Rover Defender

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.5–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeLand Rover
164ModelDefender
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats6
4Doors2

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h—
202 km/hTop speed115 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2495 cc
125 HPPower83 HP
288 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption—
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,8 ltAverage consumption14,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size205/80 R16 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4565 mmLength3722 mm
1760 mmWidth1790 mm
1390 mmHeight2000 mm
1490 KgWeight1636 Kg
2660 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Alfa Romeo 164 and 1996 Land Rover Defender approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Land Rover Defender leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…