DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Lancia Phedra vs 2005 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Phedra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–61.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeVolvo
PhedraModelV50
2005Model year2005
MinivanBody typeEstate
8Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,6 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2179 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
128 HPPower136 HP
314 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank52 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
7,4 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4750 mmLength4522 mm
1863 mmWidth1845 mm
1760 mmHeight1457 mm
1710 KgWeight1472 Kg
2823 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Lancia Phedra and 2005 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Phedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…