2005 • Volvo
V50
Volvo V50 2.0 D (136Hp) 2005Overall Score61.75/100
2005 Volvo V50 vs 2005 Lancia Phedra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2005 • Lancia
Phedra
Lancia Phedra 2.2 JTD (128 Hp) 2005Overall Score62.5/100
WINNER
Lancia Phedra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.75–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volvo V50SpecificationLancia Phedra
VolvoMakeLancia
V50ModelPhedra
2005Model year2005
EstateBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
5Doors5
Performance
Volvo V50SpecificationLancia Phedra
9,6 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
136 HPPower128 HP
320 NmTorque314 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volvo V50SpecificationLancia Phedra
DieselFuel typeDiesel
52 ltFuel tank80 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
4,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volvo V50SpecificationLancia Phedra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volvo V50SpecificationLancia Phedra
4522 mmLength4750 mm
1845 mmWidth1863 mm
1457 mmHeight1760 mm
1472 KgWeight1710 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2823 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2005 Volvo V50 and 2005 Lancia Phedra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Lancia Phedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…