2002 • Lancia
Phedra
Lancia Phedra 2.0 JTD (107 Hp) 2002Overall Score57.25/100
2002 Lancia Phedra vs 2002 Saab 9-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Saab
9-3
Saab 9-3 2.0i (130 Hp) 2002Overall Score56.5/100
WINNER
Lancia Phedra
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lancia PhedraSpecificationSaab 9-3
LanciaMakeSaab
PhedraModel9-3
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeHatchback
8Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Lancia PhedraSpecificationSaab 9-3
13,4 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
174 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1985 cc
107 HPPower130 HP
270 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Lancia PhedraSpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank68 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption13,1 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Lancia PhedraSpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
215/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Lancia PhedraSpecificationSaab 9-3
4750 mmLength4629 mm
1863 mmWidth1711 mm
1760 mmHeight1428 mm
1736 KgWeight1295 Kg
2823 mmWheelbase2605 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Lancia Phedra and 2002 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Lancia Phedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…