DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Saab 9-3 vs 2002 Lancia Phedra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Phedra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SaabMakeLancia
9-3ModelPhedra
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
3/5Doors5

Performance

11,0 s0–100 km/h13,4 s
200 km/hTop speed174 km/h
1985 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
130 HPPower107 HP
177 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank80 lt
13,1 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
—Average consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size215/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4629 mmLength4750 mm
1711 mmWidth1863 mm
1428 mmHeight1760 mm
1295 KgWeight1736 Kg
2605 mmWheelbase2823 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Saab 9-3 and 2002 Lancia Phedra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Phedra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…