DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Lancia Musa vs 2010 Mazda 2 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Musa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lancia MusaSpecificationMazda 2
LanciaMakeMazda
MusaModel2
2010Model year2010
MPVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Lancia MusaSpecificationMazda 2
13,5 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
163 km/hTop speed162 km/h
1368 ccEngine displacement1399 cc
77 HPPower68 HP
115 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Lancia MusaSpecificationMazda 2
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
47 ltFuel tank43 lt
7,9 ltUrban consumption5,3 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption3,7 lt
6,2 ltAverage consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lancia MusaSpecificationMazda 2
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Lancia MusaSpecificationMazda 2
4035 mmLength3900 mm
1698 mmWidth1695 mm
1660 mmHeight1475 mm
1155 KgWeight975 Kg
2508 mmWheelbase2490 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Lancia Musa and 2010 Mazda 2 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Musa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…