DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Lancia Lybra vs 2003 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeKia
LybraModelOptima
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
150 HPPower149 HP
181 NmTorque193 Nm
5Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank65 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption—
7,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4466 mmLength4745 mm
1743 mmWidth1815 mm
1462 mmHeight1420 mm
1350 KgWeight1405 Kg
2593 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Lancia Lybra and 2003 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…