DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Kia Optima vs 2003 Lancia Lybra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeLancia
OptimaModelLybra
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,6 s
195 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
149 HPPower150 HP
193 NmTorque181 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
—Average consumption8,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4745 mmLength4466 mm
1815 mmWidth1743 mm
1420 mmHeight1462 mm
1405 KgWeight1350 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2593 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Kia Optima and 2003 Lancia Lybra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…