DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Lancia Delta vs 1994 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Delta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

44.25–44
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeMazda
DeltaModel323
1996Model year1994
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
113 HPPower56 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Average consumption5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R13

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Lancia Delta and 1994 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Delta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…