E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1994 Mazda 323 vs 1996 Lancia Delta Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Delta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

44–44.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 323SpecificationLancia Delta
MazdaMakeLancia
323ModelDelta
1994Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Mazda 323SpecificationLancia Delta
150 km/hTop speed0 km/h
0 ccEngine displacement0 cc
56 HPPower113 HP
0 NmTorque0 Nm

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 323SpecificationLancia Delta
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank0 lt
5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 323SpecificationLancia Delta
5Gears—
175/70 R13Tyre size—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1994 Mazda 323 and 1996 Lancia Delta approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Delta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1994 Mercury CapriVS1994 Mazda 323Mercury Capri vs Mazda 3231994 and 1994 model years1994 Fiat TipoVS1994 Mazda 323Fiat Tipo vs Mazda 3231994 and 1994 model years1994 Peugeot 205VS1994 Mazda 323Peugeot 205 vs Mazda 3231994 and 1994 model years1994 Rover MontegoVS1994 Mazda 323Rover Montego vs Mazda 3231994 and 1994 model years1994 Fiat TempraVS1994 Mazda 323Fiat Tempra vs Mazda 3231994 and 1994 model years

Comments are loading…