DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Audi A3 vs 2016 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

77.75–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A3SpecificationFord Mondeo
AudiMakeFord
A3ModelMondeo
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Audi A3SpecificationFord Mondeo
6,8 s0–100 km/h7,9 s
244 km/hTop speed233 km/h
1984 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
190 HPPower210 HP
320 NmTorque450 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A3SpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,3 ltUrban consumption5,6 lt
4,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
5,5 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A3SpecificationFord Mondeo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6 PowerShift
205/55 R16; 225/45 R17; 225/40 R18Tyre size215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A3SpecificationFord Mondeo
4241 mmLength4871 mm
1777 mmWidth1852 mm
1424 mmHeight1482 mm
1255 KgWeight1525 Kg
2602 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Audi A3 and 2016 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…