DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Mondeo vs 2016 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Mondeo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi A3
FordMakeAudi
MondeoModelA3
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi A3
7,9 s0–100 km/h6,8 s
233 km/hTop speed244 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
210 HPPower190 HP
450 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi A3
DieselFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption7,3 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
4,8 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 PowerShiftGears6
215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19Tyre size205/55 R16; 225/45 R17; 225/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Ford MondeoSpecificationAudi A3
4871 mmLength4241 mm
1852 mmWidth1777 mm
1482 mmHeight1424 mm
1525 KgWeight1255 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2602 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Mondeo and 2016 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Mondeo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…