1999 • AC
Aceca
AC Aceca 3.5 i V8 32V Turbo (354 Hp) 1999Overall Score81.5/100
1999 AC Aceca vs 2003 Lincoln LS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Lincoln
LS
Lincoln LS 3.9 i V8 32V (284 Hp) 2003Overall Score81.75/100
WINNER
Lincoln LS
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
81.5–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
AC AcecaSpecificationLincoln LS
ACMakeLincoln
AcecaModelLS
1999Model year2003
CoupeBody typeSedan
4Seats5
3Doors4
Performance
AC AcecaSpecificationLincoln LS
5,6 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed230 km/h
3506 ccEngine displacement3950 cc
354 HPPower284 HP
407 NmTorque388 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
AC AcecaSpecificationLincoln LS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank68 lt
20 ltUrban consumption16 lt
9 ltExtra-urban consumption9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
AC AcecaSpecificationLincoln LS
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
255/45 R18Tyre size235/50 R17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
AC AcecaSpecificationLincoln LS
4660 mmLength4925 mm
1890 mmWidth1860 mm
1340 mmHeight1450 mm
1615 KgWeight1710 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2910 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 AC Aceca and 2003 Lincoln LS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Lincoln LS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…