DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Lada 2109 vs 2000 Mazda Demio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Demio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LadaMakeMazda
2109ModelDemio
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
156 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1500 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
72 HPPower75 HP
0 NmTorque116 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank40 lt
8 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R13Tyre size175/60R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4006 mmLength3815 mm
1650 mmWidth1670 mm
1402 mmHeight1535 mm
945 KgWeight970 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2390 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Lada 2109 and 2000 Mazda Demio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Demio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…