DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Lada 2108 vs 1996 Alfa Romeo 145 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 145

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

49.75–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LadaMakeAlfa Romeo
2108Model145
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

18,0 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
140 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1100 ccEngine displacement1370 cc
54 HPPower103 HP
779 NmTorque124 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
43 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,2 ltUrban consumption10,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 SR13Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4006 mmLength4095 mm
1650 mmWidth1710 mm
1402 mmHeight1430 mm
900 KgWeight1135 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Lada 2108 and 1996 Alfa Romeo 145 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 145 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…