DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Alfa Romeo 145 vs 1996 Lada 2108 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 145

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points.

50.25–49.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeLada
145Model2108
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors3

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h18,0 s
185 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1370 ccEngine displacement1100 cc
103 HPPower54 HP
124 NmTorque779 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank43 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size165/70 SR13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4095 mmLength4006 mm
1710 mmWidth1650 mm
1430 mmHeight1402 mm
1135 KgWeight900 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Alfa Romeo 145 and 1996 Lada 2108 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 145 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…