E-Kıyasla
DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Lada 2106 vs 1990 Geo Storm Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Geo Storm

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Lada 2106SpecificationGeo Storm
LadaMakeGeo
2106ModelStorm
1990Model year1990
—Body typeCoupe
—Seats4
—Doors2

Performance

Lada 2106SpecificationGeo Storm
—0–100 km/h12,4 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1300 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
64 HPPower130 HP
92 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Lada 2106SpecificationGeo Storm
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank47 lt
—Urban consumption13 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Lada 2106SpecificationGeo Storm
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size205/50 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Lada 2106SpecificationGeo Storm
—Length4150 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1300 mm
—Weight1010 Kg
—Wheelbase2450 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Lada 2106 and 1990 Geo Storm approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Geo Storm leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

1990 Audi 80VS1990 Lada 2106Audi 80 vs Lada 21061990 and 1990 model years1990 Audi 100VS1990 Lada 2106Audi 100 vs Lada 21061990 and 1990 model years1990 Geo StormVS1990 Lada 2106Geo Storm vs Lada 21061990 and 1990 model years1986 Audi CoupeVS1990 Lada 2106Audi Coupe vs Lada 21061986 and 1990 model years1994 Alfa Romeo 146VS1990 Lada 2106Alfa Romeo 146 vs Lada 21061994 and 1990 model years

Comments are loading…