1990 • Lada
2106
Lada 2106 1.6 (75 Hp) 1990Overall Score42.25/100
1990 Lada 2106 vs 1990 Suzuki Vitara Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Suzuki
Vitara
Suzuki Vitara 1.6 (TA) 1990Overall Score42.5/100
WINNER
Suzuki Vitara
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
42.25–42.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Lada 2106SpecificationSuzuki Vitara
LadaMakeSuzuki
2106ModelVitara
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Lada 2106SpecificationSuzuki Vitara
17,5 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
150 km/hTop speed144 km/h
1569 ccEngine displacement1589 cc
75 HPPower80 HP
116 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Lada 2106SpecificationSuzuki Vitara
PetrolFuel typePetrol
39 ltFuel tank42 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption—
—Average consumption9,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Lada 2106SpecificationSuzuki Vitara
4166 mmLength3620 mm
1611 mmWidth1630 mm
1440 mmHeight1665 mm
1035 KgWeight1010 Kg
2424 mmWheelbase2200 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Lada 2106 and 1990 Suzuki Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Suzuki Vitara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…