DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1990 Lancia Delta vs 1990 Lada 2106 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Delta

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

42.5–42.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeLada
DeltaModel2106
1990Model year1990
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4+1Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h17,5 s
0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
1600 ccEngine displacement1569 cc
90 HPPower75 HP
0 NmTorque116 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank39 lt
10 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
—Tyre size175/70 SR13

Dimensions

—Length4166 mm
—Width1611 mm
—Height1440 mm
1005 KgWeight1035 Kg
—Wheelbase2424 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1990 Lancia Delta and 1990 Lada 2106 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Delta leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…